UTC | #3 > +static unsigned nvmet_tcp_recv_budget = 8 > +module_param_named(recv_budget, nvmet_tcp_recv_budget, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR) > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(recv_budget, "recvs budget") > + > +static unsigned nvmet_tcp_send_budget = 8 > +module_param_named(send_budget, nvmet_tcp_send_budget, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR) > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(send_budget, "sends budget") > + > +static unsigned nvmet_tcp_io_work_budget = 64 > +module_param_named(io_work_budget, nvmet_tcp_io_work_budget, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR) > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(io_work_budget, "io work budget") > I strongly suggest moving away from module parameters for this stuff. > Create a genetlink socket family and allow run time configuration of these knobs > by the user. > From: Sagi Grimberg > Date: Thu, 09:16:22 -0800 > +static unsigned nvmet_tcp_recv_budget = 8 > +module_param_named(recv_budget, nvmet_tcp_recv_budget, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR) > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(recv_budget, "recvs budget") > + > +static unsigned nvmet_tcp_send_budget = 8 > +module_param_named(send_budget, nvmet_tcp_send_budget, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR) > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(send_budget, "sends budget") > + > +static unsigned nvmet_tcp_io_work_budget = 64 > +module_param_named(io_work_budget, nvmet_tcp_io_work_budget, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR) > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(io_work_budget, "io work budget") > I strongly suggest moving away from module parameters for this stuff.Īlso, Sagi, can you explain about the performance trade-offs seen during TCP transport binding for NVMe over Fabrics
#Nvm install node at 8.15 driver#
Subject: nvmet-tcp: add NVMe over TCP target driver Received: from (helo=)īy with esmtpsa (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat NLcQ8uDDBsK6YuR2PHBwUKUEfF1GgSLo2h52xiFAG8K36MnexQznxPY+pFT6sfn9vopoc6pQyrnUN GUK7DbzCc2QM73lf9duFQ8wSDx3CdUsBvmbgZfxnWPUwyiDGR1dioWwQTocszKstg7gt5k37ODM99 Orsb/DnICZC5GwE9suSFTCmeTHBgMwJ7/dCW/gMHHFR/mnubJRF/9QQ6rTlRwXEPJbl5M1JAleBaH G5zPGRr7507/RKAhgJ1lmCc/k8DmDWZYMTpwBC7QfoEhndNaoz+u1gpOdV6eaKhHKu5RA9HWKczEb List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive īh=VNRrzcu9ourXH19+HWIRWWxaXLWz9D+Ot+YsVvylQ6A= Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: Received: from (:45710 "EHLOī" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by ĭKIM-Signature: v=1 a=rsa-sha256 q=dns/txt c=relaxed/relaxed ĭate:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Ĭontent-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Received: from ( )īy mail.wl. (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565D52CC68 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID,ĭKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 () on Received: by mail.wl. (Postfix, from userid 486) Received: from mail.wl. (localhost )īy mail.wl. (Postfix) with ESMTP id E391E2CC35
Received: from mail.wl. (īy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092E9109C
0 kommentar(er)
